Publication planning

A 24-month publication plan anchored to the evidence gaps that matter.

Strategy·Portal + documents

Shortlist it, send it over — we come back with the shape we'd actually recommend.

What it is

What publication planning actually is.

A 24-month publication and congress plan anchored to the evidence gaps that matter to the decisions ahead, not to the journals the team has previously been published in.

Built for medical and HEOR teams that need a defensible publication footprint behind the access submission, the field story and the launch year, and the discipline to keep it on track once planning is done.

What you get
  • 24-month publication and congress plan with rationale per item
  • White-space map against the scientific narrative
  • Target journal and congress shortlist with authorship strategy
  • Working tracker with named owners and review cadence
  • Read-out deck for medical leadership and steering committee
Build a scope of work

Add the pieces you'd want and we'll build a shortlist you can review, reorder and send over. No pricing wall, no commitment — we come back with what we'd actually recommend, including anything you don't need.

How it works

Approach, modules, delivery.

Move through the tabs to see how the work runs, what it's made of and what lands at the end.

Inputs

  • Scientific narrative and claim hierarchy
  • Evidence pipeline: trials, RWE, sub-group and post-hoc analyses
  • Target journal and congress landscape
  • Authorship history and KOL engagement records

Method

Map the publication landscape against the claim hierarchy, identify the white space against the narrative we need to land, then build a 24-month publication plan with target journals, congresses, authorship and timing. The plan ties each output to the claim it advances so it stays defensible inside ICMJE / GPP compliance.

Assumptions

  • Evidence readouts are stable enough to commit to a 24-month plan with quarterly refresh.
  • Authorship and editorial governance follow ICMJE and Good Publication Practice (GPP).

Limitations

  • Journal acceptance is never certain, the plan carries contingency journals for each priority output.
  • Congress acceptance windows constrain timing more than the team typically expects.
Scope builder

Think this belongs in your scope?

Add it alongside anything else that fits, then send the shortlist over. We'll reply with the shape we'd recommend — sequence included, and the parts we think you can skip.

Build what comes next.

Whether you need growth, answers or capability, VISFO helps you move earlier and faster.