HTA submissions

Submission support tuned to each agency's expectations and the agreed scope.

Proof·Documents and packs

Shortlist it, send it over — we come back with the shape we'd actually recommend.

What it is

What hta submissions actually is.

Strategic, evidence and authoring support for submissions to NICE, HAS, G-BA and other agencies, tailored to the agreed scope and local requirements. We bring the narrative, the evidence strategy, the review cycles and the defence preparation; the team brings the asset, the local and procedural requirements and the decision authority.

Built for access teams running their first HTA submission in a country, or running a re-submission after a negative decision. Scope is agreed up front and can range from evidence and narrative support through to drafting core sections alongside local teams.

What you get
  • Drafted submission sections in the agreed scope, tuned to the agency template
  • Evidence and model pressure-test against agency expectation
  • Defence pack with anticipated questions and structured rebuttals
  • Review-cycle support across internal sign-offs
  • Panel preparation and reviewer Q&A rehearsal
Build a scope of work

Add the pieces you'd want and we'll build a shortlist you can review, reorder and send over. No pricing wall, no commitment — we come back with what we'd actually recommend, including anything you don't need.

How it works

Approach, modules, delivery.

Move through the tabs to see how the work runs, what it's made of and what lands at the end.

Inputs

  • Existing evidence dossier and GVD modules
  • Agency-specific submission templates and previous decisions in adjacent classes
  • Internal interviews across HEOR, access and medical

Method

Hands-on submission support tuned to each agency's expectations. We draft the narrative spine, fit the evidence into the agency's template, run internal review cycles and prepare the team for the committee meeting. The output is a submission-ready draft and the working-session muscle memory the team needs to defend it.

Assumptions

  • Agency template and current methods guide are stable across the submission window.
  • The team will commit to a structured review cadence with named owners.

Limitations

  • We draft and pressure-test; final regulatory sign-off remains the sponsor's.
Scope builder

Think this belongs in your scope?

Add it alongside anything else that fits, then send the shortlist over. We'll reply with the shape we'd recommend — sequence included, and the parts we think you can skip.

Build what comes next.

Whether you need growth, answers or capability, VISFO helps you move earlier and faster.